by VentinovaMedical | Feb 8, 2023
Abram et al. Individualised flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in a porcine oleic acid-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome model. Eur J Anaesth 2023 In experimental ARDS individualized FCV improved P/F ratio (+35%; P=0.07), while a lower...
by VentinovaMedical | Nov 10, 2022
Schranc et al. Flow-controlled ventilation maintains gas exchange and lung aeration in a pediatric model of healthy and injured lungs: A randomized cross-over experimental study. Front Pediatr. 2022 This porcine experimental study represents the first investigation of...
by VentinovaMedical | Sep 27, 2022
Spraider et al. Individualised flow-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation in a porcine model of thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation: A laboratory study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 37:1 – 10 This publication by Dr. Spraider and...
by VentinovaMedical | Aug 12, 2022
Grassetto et al. Flow-controlled ventilation may reduce mechanical power and increase ventilatory efficiency in severe coronavirus disease-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pulmonology 2022 In this pilot study, Dr. Grassetto and colleagues evaluated the effect...
by VentinovaMedical | Apr 24, 2022
Silva et al. Personalized Mechanical Ventilation Settings: Slower Is Better! In: Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2022 In this book chapter on individualized mechanical ventilation approaches Prof. Pelosi and colleagues acknowledge FCV as a...
Recent Comments